Published OData service naming conventions

2
Hi, is there already a best practice for naming published OData service microflows? https://docs.mendix.com/refguide/dev-best-practices/#349-integration-microflows doesn’t give some. If not – what would be a good name? POS_? POD_? regards, Fabian  
asked
2 answers
2

Hi Fabian,

 

I never noticed. Would vote for POS_ as it matches the pattern of other integration microflow naming conventions’ prefix abbreviation, that is ending with S_

answered
1

POS_ has won

 

answered